References

= References = Research Articles Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. //Remedial and Special Education//, //24//, 235-245. Calhoon, M. B., Fuchs, L. S., & Hamlett, C. L. (2000). Effects of computer-based test accommodations on mathematics performance assessments for secondary students with learning disabilities. //Learning Disabilities Quarterly//, //23//, 271-282.
 * Calhoon and Fuchs investigated the effects of peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS) and curriculum-based measurement (CBM) on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. They found that students using the PALS/CBM improved in mathematics computation skills but not on concepts and applications.
 * Calhoon, Fuchs, and Hamlett compared the effects of four conditions of accommodations for testing in secondary mathematics: computer-read test, computer-read test with video, teacher read test, and standard administration. Results indicated that providing a reader – either computer or human – increased test scores.

Wissick, C. A., Lloyd, J. W., & Kinzie, M. B. (1992). The effects of community training using a videodisc-based simulation. //Journal of Special Education Technology//, //11//, 207-222. Books
 * Wissick investigated the use of a multimedia video based simulation to train students with moderate disabilities how to locate items in a convenience store. The students learned a process to locate items using the simulation. They were then tested on their skills in the actual stores. Using a multiple baseline across subject design two students of the three students were able to increase to generalize their skills for item location from the simulation to the actual store.

The Alliance for Technology Access, (2000). Computer and Web resources for people with disabilities: A guide to exploring today’s assistive technology, 3rd edition, : Salt Lake City, Utah: Publishers Press.

Brown, A. & Green, T. D. (2006). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Upper Saddle River: NJ: Pearson

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1978). [|The Systematic Design of Instruction.] Glenview, IL.: Scott, Foresman. Retrieved from www.nwlink.com/~donclark/history_isd/carey.html August 27, 2008

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O., (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (2007). The ID casebook : Case studies in instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Lindsey, J. D., (2008). Technology and exceptional individuals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Lohr, L. L., (2008). Creating graphics for learning and performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. [|Activities]: www.akoism.com/lohr2/

Mayer, R. E. (ed .) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.